The ALL Florida Online Corvette Club








Corvette Top Sites

Go Back   The ALL Florida Online Corvette Club > Florida Specific Forums > Legal Issues

      Photo Gallery Screen Saver!      

Legal Issues Traffic tickets | Laws | Pending Legislation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-23-2007, 06:06 AM   #1
sandman
Member
 
sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 437
Name :
sandman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow
"Technically" it's a violation of Florida traffic law. A friend of mind just received a citation for just that from a Tampa Police Officer! I'm sure happy to know that Tampa is so F**king safe we have nothing better to worry about than frames!

For my $.02, it's one of the more Charlie Sierra laws we have on our books. I refuse to write a citation for it unless I'm:

A) Looking for Probable Cause to stop for "other reasons."
B) You piss me off!

If the tag frame obscures the renewal decal, thats one thing. If it covers the word FLORIDA or that rediculous "Myflorida.com" crap, then who the hell cares?

God I'd make a lousy politician!!!
Maybe but it sounds like you are a really good and fair cop. Thanks
sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-23-2007, 07:35 AM   #2
Shadow
Senior Member
 
Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: port of indecision
Posts: 5,604
Name :
Shadow will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman
Maybe but it sounds like you are a really good and fair cop. Thanks

Sandman

Unfortunately, unless I can find another "home", I'll be a Ronin (masterless warrior) at the end of the month

Oh well, 30 years might have just been long enough

Hot Pursuit,

Hang in there brother. Classy didn't mean Ill of any of us in her post. If you'd met her you'd know what I mean

It's like you said, we (LEO's) pick and choose what we enforce and for whatever reason(s). And although a law is a law, I really believe there are those among us who really need a better grip on reality

I happen to agree with her on a couple of points though. This particular law (IMO), really is petty. At least the strict interpretation of it. The intent is/was good but it really needs to be clairified.

You're also right that we (LEO's) sometimes don't have the option to pick and choose what we write; however, most the time we do

Unfortunately you're also correct in your statement that some departments and some supervisors, "require" us to issue a certain number of citations per week/month/day This is ILLEGAL however, since no one has the balls to put it in writing it'll never be prosecuted. It's lumped under the heading of "activity."

I've worked for supervisors that required certain levels of activity but wanted "quality" over "quantity."

If on Midnights, your zone was in tact come daybreak, you picked up a couple of quality FIR's (Field Interrogation Reports), maybe wrote a ticket or 2 (especially if it was PC for something bigger), put an arse in jail for DUI, and survived to see the sun rise (and without a pending lawsuit to boot), then you had a good night

Daytime and evenings were the high traffic enforcement times for us due to traffic loads on the highways. Evenings were also high criminal arrest periods.

I've also worked for Sgts that were just the opposite. One in particular, didn't care that you just put a butt in bars over a domestic violence. You didn't write any citations and that was bad The boy picked the wrong uniform for a career.

You're also correct in your statement that WE elect the politicians who then reflect our needs and desires. The problem is, they go off on thier own agendas and do stupis stuff like this and WE the people keep electing them back into office?????

Watch your politicians folks. Let them know when you r satisfied with thier actions and when you're not.

A law is the law, but judgement and officer discretion is always on our side. We have the option of enforcing or not. I've always taught my rookies that (especially working for a Sheriff) that the public is your "customer." Sometimes they go to jail, sometimes they don't. Sometimes they get the ticket, other times a warning. A lot depends on the nature of the act or violation and the attitude of the party(ies) involved.

We can do a lot of good PR with a warning, still show activity (yep, I was out stopping cars today) and validate PC for other actions...all with a warning. And the warning doesn't cost anyone a dime. No need to have it corrected and inspected, no fee to pay for the inspection, and no points or insurance action.
The "fix it' ticket you are talking about, still requires the offender to correct the action and show proof. They also are required to pay a fee to have this inspected at the local PD/SO.

If all the border does is obstruct "myFlorida.com" where's the real violation?

I believe that strict interpretations of law should be held in abeyance for those who truly deserve it. PC for a drug stop for example.

Otherwise, it should be the intent rather than the letter of the law thats enforced. This is what I've always taught and continue until I can no longer do so. Fairness and common sense.

Take the PBA emblems for example. We see them all the time, bolted to someones tag. By bolting it on the corner, it obstructs a good part of the tag. Thats got to go!!

How about the FHP supporter or FOP supporter decal that some use to cover the orange in the center of the tag? Technically that has to go. It doesn't obstruct anything meaningful so I generally ignore it.

Sure writing tickets is easy. It's become even easier with the advent of automated ticket writers. And good criminal cases are sometimes a bear to put together and certainly as you mentioned, even harder at times to get some judges to convict. But remember 2 things folks.

1) You (and I) put the judges in place and we can remove them!
2) The politicians are the one footing these "bills" to increse or reduce jail sentences and raise traffic fines. Don't like them? VOTE THEM OUT!

Frankly, the fines have gotten out of hand in this state and the "tag on" items are noting more that additional taxes!

Do you recall when we used to be able to write "failure to obey a traffic control devise (speed limit sign) instead of the high dollar speeding ticket itself?

At the time, the FTOTCD was in the $70.00 range. The speeding tickets were a base fine ++++

We were told in writing that the courts in Hillsborough County would no longer accept these cases. Why? It's glaringly obvious to me. $$$$$$ Cha-Ching!!! The coffers were getting empty.

This "law" was available to us, valid to use and certainly within the scope of the violation, yet we were prevented from writing it?????
Thats the kind of crap that gets under my skin!

HP, talk about art? Take a look at downtown Tampa. We're becoming the artsy fartsy capitol of the freakin' world (right behind Sarasota-but they can afford it! )

We hear all the scare tactic talk about reducing services and law enforcement/firefighters and paramedics. Folks, it's ain't gonna happen

Reduce Law Enforcement, watch the crime rate rise and tourism $$$ drop.

Sure some small departments will sell out to the Sheriff and some services will be lost. But "basic" law enforcement will still be available. It's just cheaper to contract to the S.O. than maintain your own agency.

As far as the site goes, this is a very family and member friendly environment and as you and I both know, it's much more laid back here.

I really think you read Classy wrong on this one. I've spoken with her personally and she's not a vengeful, bashing type person. Her families involvement in law enforcement solidifies that even moreso

We don't have LEO bashing here like we do on the "other site" and I hope it stays that way. I've not met anyone here who has had any feelings adverse to us.
I really hope you stay with us bro, but I think you might have misinterpreted her statement.

Later man and stay safe out there....

Gordon
Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-23-2007, 08:27 AM   #3
JIM KILL
TampaBay Vettes
 
JIM KILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1,810
Name : Jim Kill
JIM KILL is on a distinguished road
Talking Well Said Gordon

Well Said Gordon.......


320.0607 Replacement license plates, validation decal, or mobile home sticker.--

(1) Any law enforcement officer or department license and registration inspector may at any time inspect a license plate or validation decal for proper display and legibility as prescribed by chapter 316. A damaged or defaced plate or decal may be required to be replaced.
(2)

When a license plate, mobile home sticker, or validation decal has been lost, stolen, or destroyed, the owner of the motor vehicle or mobile home for which the plate, sticker, or decal was issued shall make application to the department for a replacement. The application shall contain the plate, sticker, or decal number being replaced and a statement that the item was lost, stolen, or destroyed. If the application includes a copy of the police report prepared in response to a report of a stolen plate, sticker, or decal, such plate, sticker, or decal must be replaced at no charge.

(3) Except as provided in subsection (2), in all such cases, upon filing of an application accompanied by a fee of $10 plus applicable service charges, the department shall issue a replacement plate, sticker, or decal as the case may be if it is satisfied that the information reported in the application is true. The replacement fee shall be deposited into the Highway Safety Operating Trust Fund.

(4) Any license plate, sticker, or decal lost in the mail may be replaced at no charge. Neither the service charge nor the replacement fee shall be applied to this replacement. However, the application for a replacement shall contain a statement of such fact, the audit number of the lost item, and the date issued.

(5) Upon the issuance of an original license plate, the applicant shall pay a fee of $10 to be deposited in the Highway Safety Operating Trust Fund.

(6) All funds derived from the sale of temporary tags under the provisions of s. 320.131 shall be deposited in the Highway Safety Operating Trust Fund.

Jim
JIM KILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2007, 10:02 PM   #4
brasscannon
Zoom zoom
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 17
Name :
brasscannon has disabled reputation
Default

I'm all the way over on the other side of the country, and we have photo radar all over the place. Yet I see quite a few people with almost-opaque license plate covers. Gotta be illegal, but guess what else we don't have? There's no annual inspection! None! It's old car heaven out here.
brasscannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-02-2007, 11:15 AM   #5
Vette900hp
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pompano Beach
Posts: 25
Name :
Vette900hp has disabled reputation
Default

hey I know this may sound a little stupid but is it illegal or will the tag agencies allow a plate to say OQOQOO or something of that matter...since it would be extremley difficult to read it??? just wondering...ive never seen anything like it but heard from somwhere about someone wanting to do that
Vette900hp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
photo radar license plate covers ZEEEE06 Legal Issues 17 04-11-2007 10:03 PM
Bill proposed to BAN radar detectors in Florida Rich Z Legal Issues 21 03-07-2007 07:57 AM
License plate frames C5 rear stevecris General Corvette Discussions 3 06-19-2006 05:43 PM
316.1935 Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer Rich Z Legal Issues 0 03-09-2006 02:29 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.05771589 seconds with 11 queries
All material copyrighted by CorvetteFlorida.com and
the respective owners of the material posted.